Case Studies Quiz – Topic 12 WHS Due Diligence for CEO’s, Directors and Managers – TAS Edition WHS Due Diligence for CEO’s, Directors and Managers – TAS Edition Case Studies Case Studies Quiz – Topic 12 WHS Due Diligence for CEOs, Directors and Managers Case Studies Quiz – Topic 12 This quiz contains court cases from other jurisdictions that also have the WHS Act implemented. These cases are therefore relevant to WA. Time limit: 0 Quiz Summary 0 of 3 Questions completed Questions: Information You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again. Quiz is loading… You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz. You must first complete the following: Results Quiz complete. Results are being recorded. Results 0 of 3 Questions answered correctly Your time: Time has elapsed You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0) Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0) 0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0) Categories Not categorized 0% 1 2 3 Question 1 of 3 1. Question Harris Holdings Pty Ltd and Harry Zizikas, 2 November 2017. PCBU and OFFICER On 26 November 2015 a worker was fatally injured when he came into contact with the tracks of an excavator at a waste sorting facility. After a regulator investigation the defendants, Harris Holdings Pty Ltd and its director Harry Zizikas, were charged with a breach of sections 32/19(1) and 32/27(1) respectively of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. How would you predict the outcome of this court case? The company was fined $5,000 and the director nil Correct Incorrect Correct answer The director was found not guilty Correct Incorrect Correct answer The director was fined $60,000 and the company $300,000 Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 2 of 3 2. Question Building Maintenance Unit Service Pty Ltd & Investa Asset Management Pty Ltd Feb/Aug 2019. MULTIPLE PCBUs On 20 October 2015, two window cleaners were seriously injured when the Building Maintenance Unit (BMU) they were using to clean the external windows of the building failed, and they fell, along with the BMU, from the 12th floor, at Sydney. After a regulator investigation, the defendant, Investa Asset Management Pty Ltd, was charged with a breach of section 32/19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act (the Act)and the defendant, Building Maintenance Unit Service Pty Ltd, was charged with a breach of section 32/19(2) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. How would you predict the outcome of this court case? All were found to be not guilty Correct Incorrect Correct answer Building Maintenance Unit Service Pty Ltd fined $300,000, Investa Asset Management Pty Ltd fined $400,000 Correct Incorrect Correct answer Building Maintenance Unit Service Pty Ltd fined $450,000, Investa Asset Management Pty Ltd was found not guilty Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect Question 3 of 3 3. Question Cold Spark Pty Ltd – Director Nathan Brian Day. OFFICER In February 2012, a Worker, Mr Garrels, was fatally electrocuted after carrying a switchboard that had come into contact with live wires during heavy rain at a construction site fortownhouses. How would you predict the outcome of this court case? Officer (Nathan Brian Day) was put on 3 months community service Correct Incorrect Correct answer Officer (Nathan Brian Day) was sentenced to 7 years jail in total Correct Incorrect Correct answer Cold Spark Pty Ltd was found to be in compliance with the WHS Act Correct Incorrect Correct answer Correct Incorrect
